Ayodgya Verdict (Paper)
- Riya Luhadia, Jaipur National University
- December 20, 2020
Content :
This Research Paper focuses on the dispute arise between Hindus and Muslims regarded the land in Ayodhya which was the hot topic and needs the urgent resolution because it is a very sensitive matter in regard with the religions and that too between Hindus and Muslim. The judgement was very calm in context with both the religions but if this was not according to what happened then there were high chances of riots in the Country between the religions and which directly affects the Political parties and their support system.
At that time the assertion and counter-arguments were around the original possession of the site and are entrenched in the Supreme Court’s judgement, the governing that where the Babri Mosque stood until 1992, now Hindus may build the temple there, which was clear to meets the objective expressed in the BJP’s Election Manifesto before the elections. The Supreme Court’s judgement, however, was beyond dispute, if we see with the view of justice and eyes of judges, governed as it is by the Indian Constitution.
In analysing the solution of the biggest and largest dispute at Ayodhya regarding the site in the state of Uttar Pradesh, in which Hindu claim that a Ram Temple had been there on the site before the Mughal building of the Babri Masjid Mosque in the sixteenth century, any examination related to the matter is governed by the right of the Indian Supreme Court to create and dictate a finding supported by the authority under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution.
