Should the State\'s Interest Take Priority Over the Rights of Individuals? (Paper)
- Tvisha Gupta, Bennett University
- December 25, 2020
Content :
There are a lot of government hypotheses. Many political ideologies exist in the society. Each provides an insight into how state can maintain and exert control over people. Each works in a somewhat more neutral standpoint on how it is that society should be governed. Everyone has what an Appropriate Prototype.
The state behaves according the prototype. One of the aspects wherein governments should function is to overcome contradictions that exist between the interests that people have in their own well-being and satisfaction in every community and the interest that the community as a whole has in its well-being.
There is a natural conflict in every culture between interests of individuals and interests of the group as a whole. There is a discrepancy between what people want and what suits their needs and what is necessary for the whole group\'s health, protection and security. The conflict must be mitigated by state.
The dispute would be resolved in favor of one or the other sets of interests, based on the form of view that is operational about the essence of the social arrangement and complexity of state. Ethically, culturally and socially, if the state is to become the master or servant of its individual citizens is the paramount problem of the modern period. Liberty is inherent.
One aspect of liberty fosters another, much like communism fosters tyranny in others through one sector. The basic individual rights are their human rights and fundamental rights. Plenty believe in the government\'s authority to be led by the state. Citizens have drifted from such beliefs over years and also have violated their privileges. There must be no excuse for having these liberties stripped from them. Individual rights are a must in democracy and should feature prominently.
Over time, we have to choose to favor the privileges of the state and the viewpoints they have. Basically, state rights grant the government the power to regulate and set rules for individuals instead of allowing the individual to decide for his or herself and regulate their own conduct. With the domination of states over individuals, issues also arise, and certain individuals may be alienated by various laws and proposals.
A government should be completely fair to all people and its own choices should be made by each person. Contemporary spectrum of individual rights accomplishments must look strange for a person who was taught to look at basic individual rights as arguments against the state. While freedom used to imply the expression of personal liberty beyond state intervention, the requirements for the practice of a right must now also be met in order to thrive, and a minimal of positive regulation seems to be appropriate.
Unexpectedly, what was once a topic of unchallenged individual preference appears rare and unpredictable in absence of positive control? There are some drawbacks to liberties without legislative approval in a very highly protected system. Freedom may require a favorable policy climate that provides legal consistency and ability to choose effectively.
